[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Spacewalk-list] Problems with 32 and 64bit CentOS



We're fixing this and will push out new packages soon (probably
tomorrow) with the fix.

-Justin

Justin Sherrill wrote:
> John Hodrien wrote:
>   
>> So I tried to install 0.2 to see if NEVRA was sorted.  My hope was
>> that this
>> would mean I could push 32/64bit versions of Fedora 9 and CentOS 5
>> into the
>> same spacewalk with no funny tricks necessary.
>>
>> I created channels for 64bit and 32bit CentOS.
>>
>> I pushed the 64bit content first (which all went on fine).
>>
>> I then pushed the 32bit content, and it refuses to push any package that
>> matches with 64bit, e.g.
>>
>> Package checksum
>> /usr/not-backed-up/spacewalk/yum-mirrors/32bit/updates/RPMS/xen-libs-3.0.3-64.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
>>
>> mismatch -- Skipping Upload (use --force to force upload)
>>
>> I thought initially it was because I'd got the wrong rhnpush installed
>> (since
>> it's lower versioned than the SW 0.1 rhnpush so it didn't
>> automatically get
>> upgraded), but even with the right rhnpush and a clean spacewalk I'm
>> getting
>> the same problem.
>>
>> Using --force proved entertaining, but not quite right.  The package
>> is pushed
>> and appears in the filesystem.  In the web interface it's very odd. 
>> Both 32
>> and 64 bit channels show the md5sum from the 64bit package, but if you
>> look
>> for the packages you get the other package listed too, but not against a
>> channel.
>>
>> Should I be expecting this to work or not?
>>
>> jh
>>
>>     
> looking into this...
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>   


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]