[Spacewalk-list] Odd event...

[John Hodrien]

On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, m.roth2006 at rcn.com wrote:

> Well, I started looking at what I have in /var/www/html/pub/<blah>-x86_64,
> and found over 700 packages with *i386* (back to a reposync issue, I think).
> So I looked at the base channel for CentOS 5.2, and right there, on the
> first page, is both the 386 and the x86_64. I tried to use the filter by
> package name, to identify all the i386 packages that are in there in error,
> so I could select and delete 'em.

You're not just referring to all the perfectly legitimate i386 packages that
would be part of a 64bit distro?

> Ahh, nope. *.i386 doesn't work, nor does *i386*, nor any variant. I couldn't
> even find agg*.i386 or agg*.i386.*, which is on the first page. All I get is
> an empty set.
>
> Any ideas as to the SQL query syntax it's trying to perform? And yes, I also
> just tried it with %i386%.

If you don't know what you're doing, don't just do random stuff.  It's not
going to end well.

jh

-- 
"This island is made mainly of coal and surrounded by fish.  Only an organizing
  genius could produce a shortage of coal and fish at the same time."
                                                      -- Aneurin Bevan