[Spacewalk-list] Mr. 500 here... more info

[Michael ORourke]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <m.roth2006 at rcn.com>
To: <spacewalk-list at redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Mr. 500 here... more info


> >Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:44:41 -0700
>>From: Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com>
>>On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:28 PM,  <m.roth2006 at rcn.com> wrote:
>>>>Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:13:10 -0500
>>>>From: Máirí­n Duffy <duffy at redhat.com>
>>>>Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Mr. 500 here... more info
>>>>> Mairin,
>>>>>> Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:00:47 -0500 From: Máirín Duffy
>>>>>> <duffy at redhat.com> m.roth2006 at rcn.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> What is in this template? That seems like a good place to
>>>>>>>> investigate. If it's not CentOSSS @Base, then the problem may
>>>>>>>> lie in diff between the template you're using and @Base.
>>> <snip>
>>>>can you do rpm -qa on each and diff it?
>>>
>>> There are a lot of differences - I'd guess they did a full yum update on 
>>> the template between when they made the test machine, and what was used 
>>> on the new system.
>>
>>At this point you are the only source out of many people who have
>>CentOS-5 boxes. So I would say you are putting the cart before the
>>horse.. At this point, we know that you are having a problem, and do
>>not know why. We know that other people who have replied to one of
>>your threads have not had this problem. So it is a matter to find out
>>what is the difference between your system and others.
>
> Interesting thought: so, let me ask: anyone with spacewalk running on 
> CentOS 5.2 (final): what does your uname -a show?

[mike at hubble ~]$ uname -a
Linux hubble.xxxxxxxxxx.com 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 
EST 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux

-Mike

>
>       mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list