[Spacewalk-list] Mr. 500 here... more info

[m.roth2006 at rcn.com]

>Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:44:41 -0700
>From: Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com>  
>On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:28 PM,  <m.roth2006 at rcn.com> wrote:
>>>Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:13:10 -0500
>>>From: Máirí­n Duffy <duffy at redhat.com>
>>>Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Mr. 500 here... more info
>>>> Mairin,
>>>>> Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:00:47 -0500 From: Máirín Duffy
>>>>> <duffy at redhat.com> m.roth2006 at rcn.com wrote:
>>>>>>> What is in this template? That seems like a good place to
>>>>>>> investigate. If it's not CentOSSS @Base, then the problem may
>>>>>>> lie in diff between the template you're using and @Base.
>> <snip>
>>>can you do rpm -qa on each and diff it?
>>
>> There are a lot of differences - I'd guess they did a full yum update on the template between when they made the test machine, and what was used on the new system.
>
>At this point you are the only source out of many people who have
>CentOS-5 boxes. So I would say you are putting the cart before the
>horse.. At this point, we know that you are having a problem, and do
>not know why. We know that other people who have replied to one of
>your threads have not had this problem. So it is a matter to find out
>what is the difference between your system and others.

Interesting thought: so, let me ask: anyone with spacewalk running on CentOS 5.2 (final): what does your uname -a show?

       mark