[Spacewalk-list] Can't register a client with spacewalk 1.0

[Miroslav Suchý]

On 05/05/2010 12:34 PM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 04:27:35PM -0400, Justin Sherrill wrote:
>>
>> So i narrowed the issue down to this commit:
>>
>> http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=spacewalk.git;a=commit;h=015c750daa164e80cca51bd683270fa1f91352ad
>>
>> Basically cfg['supportsExtendedPackageProfile'] is 1 when it should be 2.
>>
>> Jan, I'm not too familiar with how those capabilities work (and they tie
>> into the cfg part) and I don't just want to revert the commit.
>
> I did that change after talking to Mirek who (IIRC) did the bump to 2
> and change of the parameters type from list to hash as part of the
> "rpm installation date" feature. We primarily did that for Fedoras,
> but the worst thing which should have happened is that the
> installation dates would not show up on the server.

Nope. Based on that capability is sent either list or dictionary. So 
worst thing which can happend is blow up of traceback due incompatible 
data structure, which is afaik happening right now.
-- 
Miroslav Suchy
Red Hat Satellite Engineering