[Spacewalk-list] Feature comparison of Satellite vs. Spacewalk

[Aaron Prayther]

Ok, so that makes sense.  So I can put the whole thing out there.  Just
tell them you can demo the entire Systems Management infrastructure
using Fedora and if you want to use RHEL in a production environment
then you replace Spacewalk with Satellite.

Thanks for the response.

Aaron Prayther

-----Original Message-----
From: spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Jan Pazdziora
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 11:01 AM
To: spacewalk-list at redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Feature comparison of Satellite vs.
Spacewalk

On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:34:43AM -0400, Aaron Prayther wrote:
> I have a systems management infrastructure using Satellite,
subversion,
> puppet and OVAL for a customer and wanted to fully understand the
> differences between Spacewalk and Satellite.  I'm wondering if I can
> reproduce my solution I have now in an environment that I can readily
> have available on a public facing web site.  Still being able to
manage
> RHEL entitled boxes.

Note that getting content from Red Hat Network using satellite-sync
is not supported on Spacewalk.

-- 
Jan Pazdziora
Principal Software Engineer, Satellite Engineering, Red Hat

_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list