[Spacewalk-list] applying CESA-2010:0737 Important: freetype Update to x86_64 hosts doesn't work

[Yungwei Chen]

If the errata are created before the 64-bit packages are downloaded, will the 32-bit packages be used instead?
If I remove CESA-2010:0737 erratum from spacewalk, will centos-errata.py generate it again?

-----Original Message-----
From: spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of David Nutter
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 11:40 AM
To: spacewalk-list at redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] applying CESA-2010:0737 Important: freetype Update to x86_64 hosts doesn't work

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:29:54PM -0400, Yungwei Chen wrote:
> I checked my CentOS 5 Update - x86_64 channel, and I do see both 32-bit and 64-bit packages below.
> So for some reason spacewalk shows 32-bit packages for 64-bit hosts in some of the errata (CEBA-2010:0789, CESA-2010:0787, CEBA-2010:0764, etc). Besides manually adding 64-bit packages to those errata, Is there a way to fix this permanently? Thanks.
> 
> freetype-2.2.1-28.el5_5.i386   	 CentOS 5 Update - x86_64
> freetype-2.2.1-28.el5_5.x86_64 	CentOS 5 Update - x86_64

Most likely a bug in centos-errata.py then - it's not associating the
correct packages with the errata when it creates it. I will try to
take a look over the next week or so and fix the problem.

Regards,

-- 
David Nutter  				Tel: +44 (0)131 650 4888
BioSS, JCMB, King's Buildings, Mayfield Rd, EH9 3JZ. Scotland, UK 

Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland (BioSS) is formally part of The
Scottish Crop Research Institute (SCRI), a registered Scottish charity
No. SC006662

_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list