[Spacewalk-list] Modification of spacewalk-service script

[Pierre Casenove]

Hey,
It's just my point of view, but spacewalk is kind of ressource consuming on
a server and in my point of view, it should be alone. But I understand some
people does put other DB on the same server than spacewalk.
Reading at the discussion, I think that the admin should be able to tell if
the DB should be controlled or not by the script in /etc/rhn/rhn.conf. I
don't think that this idea has been implemented.

OK for oracle control.

Anyway, I'll try to find how to get rid of the osa-dispatcher log message.

Pierre



2011/11/3 Jan Pazdziora <jpazdziora at redhat.com>

> On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 10:55:44AM +0100, Pierre Casenove wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I understand (although I don't share the conclusion: if postgresql is
> > running locally, only spacewalk database should exist).
>
> Why exactly?
>
> > In that case, why leaving the test if /etc/init.d/oracle is executable in
> > the script and the DB_SERVICE variable?
>
> That is Satellite embedded database thing. Note that the typical
> Oracle XE installation uses the oracle-xe service name.
>
> --
> Jan Pazdziora
> Principal Software Engineer, Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20111103/be863599/attachment.htm>