[Spacewalk-list] Repo woes
Dimitri Yioulos
dyioulos at onpointfc.com
Tue Aug 6 14:10:09 UTC 2013
Hi, Thomas.
I'm virtually positive I used IA-32. I tried x86_64
architecture, and the sync did seem to work, to the extent
that I can see the packages listed in the repo. However
(you saw this coming, right?), that channel is greyed out,
and hence unavailable, to my 32-bit boxes.
Dimitri
On Tuesday 06 August 2013 8:56:49 am Thomas Foster wrote:
> When you created the channel befoee did you use ia or
> x86_64..I have 32bit rpms in my x86_64 repo..so try
> creating a new repo and assign the arch as 86_64 and sync
>
> On Aug 6, 2013 8:51 AM, "Dimitri Yioulos"
<dyioulos at onpointfc.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply, Paul.
> >
> > Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be the case for me.
> > If I run the sync from the command line, it completes
> > in seconds with the X86_64 error message (syncing from
> > the GUI also doesn't work, obviously). Also, in the
> > "Full Software Channel List", while other channels show
> > the number of packages acquired during the sync, the
> > Samba channel shows a zero. It seems I've tried
> > every combination of entry when creating the
> > channel/repo, and it errors, one way or the other.
> > What really ticks me off is that I once had the channel
> > working. I just don't remember how. Arrrrgh!
> >
> > Dimitri
> >
> >
> > On Monday 05 August 2013 7:07:18 pm Paul Robert Marino
> >
> > wrote:
> > > The error message isn't wrong the repo on the site is
> > > just strange. All that means is it can't sync the
> > > X86_64 packages so it will ignore them the rest
> > > should sync fine.
> > >
> > > I get the same error from HP's ProLiant repos because
> > > it contains source rpms however the channels in
> > > spacewalk still work despite the errors.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -- Sent from my HP Pre3
> > >
> > > On Aug 5, 2013 18:10, Thomas Foster
> > > <thomas.foster80 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > change the architecture to x86_64 for the repo..then
> > > try and sync
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Dimitri Yioulos
> > > <dyioulos at onpointfc.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On the Spacewalk server?
> > >
> > > With respect, what difference should it make? The
> > > Spacewalk server is built on CentOS 6, but has
> > > Spacewalk repos for CentOS 5 that sync just fine.
> > >
> > > Dimitri
> > >
> > > On Monday 05 August 2013 4:34:10 pm Thomas Foster
wrote:
> > > > What's the output of yum repolist ?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Dimitri Yioulos
> > >
> > > <dyioulos at onpointfc.com>wrote:
> > > > > Thomas,
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, and yes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Dimitri
> > > > >
> > > > > On Monday 05 August 2013 4:00:26 pm Thomas
> > > > > Foster
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > > > Did you just add the repo? If so, did you yum
> > > > > > clean metadata?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Lewis Donofrio
> > > > >
> > > > > <lewis.donofrio at gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > > > > I'm new here but why not use 2nd party
> > > > > > > Centos repo's for samba?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > ____________________________________________
> > > > > > >____ ___
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >____ ____________
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://www.vizify.com/lewis-donofrio -
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 734-743-1743
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Dimitri
> > > > > > > Yioulos
> > > > >
> > > > > <dyioulos at onpointfc.com>wrote:
> > > > > > >> H, all.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I recently upgraded Spacewalk to the latest
> > > > > > >> and greatest from version 1.8.
> > > > > > >> Unfortunately, the upgrade didn't go well,
> > > > > > >> and all of my settings were lost. The
> > > > > > >> silver lining here is that, by recreating
> > > > > > >> everything, I learned a lot (or, at least,
> > > > > > >> refreshed my memory).
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> However, I'm having a problem getting on
> > > > > > >> recreated cahnnel/repo working. Many of
> > > > > > >> our Linux boxes use Samba; the packages
> > > > > > >> come from Sernet. I created the channel
> > > > > > >> and repo for my CentOS 5 systems, but the
> > > > > > >> repo won't sync. When I try to sync from
> > > > > > >> the command line, here's the output I get:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> spacewalk-repo-sync --channel
> > > > > > >> sernet-samba-el5 --type yum Repo URL:
> > > > > > >> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5
> > > > > > >> Packages in repo: 22
> > > > > > >> Packages already synced: 0
> > > > > > >> Packages to sync: 22
> > > > > > >> 1/22 : samba3-utils-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > > > >> 2/22 :
> > > > > > >> samba3-winbind-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64 3/22
> > > > > > >> :
> > > > > > >> libsmbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > > > >> 4/22
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> : libwbclient0-32bit-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > > > >> : 5/22
> > > > > > >> : libwbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > > > >> : 6/22 samba3-doc-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > > > >> : 7/22 :
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> libwbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64 8/22 :
> > > > > > >> samba3-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > > > >> 9/22 :
> > > > > > >> samba3-debuginfo-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > > > >> 10/22 :
> > > > > > >> samba3-client-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64 11/22
> > > > > > >> : libsmbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > > > >> 12/22 :
> > > > > > >> samba3-winbind-32bit-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > > > >> 13/22
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> : samba3-winbind-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386 14/22
> > > > > > >> : :
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> libwbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386 15/22 :
> > > > > > >> samba3-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > > > >> 16/22 : samba3-client-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > > > >> 17/22 :
> > > > > > >> samba3-debuginfo-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386 18/22
> > > > > > >> : libsmbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > > > >> 19/22 : samba3-doc-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > > > >> 20/22 : libsmbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > > > >> 21/22 : samba3-utils-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > > > >> 22/22 :
> > > > > > >> libwbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > > > >> Linking packages to channel.
> > > > > > >> ERROR: Package arch x86_64 incompatible
> > > > > > >> with channel sernet-samba-el5
> > > > > > >> Sync completed.
> > > > > > >> Total time: 0:00:06
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> The machines to be updated are 32-bit. I
> > > > > > >> chose IA-32 as the Architecture, and the
> > > > > > >> repo url is
> > > > > > >> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5.
> > > > > > >> If I make it
> > > > > > >> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5/i
> > > > > > >>386, I get "ERROR: Cannot retrieve
> > > > > > >> repository metadata (repomd.xml) for
> > > > > > >> repostory: sernet-samba-el5. Please verify
> > > > > > >> its path and try again.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> What's frustrating is that I did have this
> > > > > > >> working before. Any help would be greatly
> > > > > > >> appreciated.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Dimitri
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >> This message has been scanned for viruses
> > > > > > >> and dangerous content by MailScanner, and
> > > > > > >> is believed to be clean.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> ___________________________________________
> > > > > > >>____ Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > > > > > >> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > > > > > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spa
> > > > > > >>cewa lk- list
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ____________________________________________
> > > > > > >___ Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > > > > > > Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spac
> > > > > > >ewal k-l ist
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > > > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > > > > believed to be clean.
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > > > > Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewal
> > > > >k-li st
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > > believed to be clean.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > > Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > >
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-lis
> > >t
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the Spacewalk-list
mailing list