[Spacewalk-list] Clustering Spacewalk.

[Giovanni Torres]

With regards to configuration channels in this situation with two proxies, do the configuration channels get configured on the Spacewalk server only, and the proxies just route to it?  In other words, would I only configure configuration channels in one place in this scenario?
Thanks,Giovanni

> Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:32:16 +0100
> From: michael.mraka at redhat.com
> To: spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Clustering Spacewalk.
> 
> Bernard McCormack wrote:
> % Maybe I'm asking the wrong question but I have two data centers and I
> % don't want all my host to have access over the site to site vpn. What
> % would be the best configuration for this be a spacewalk proxy? or
> % would it be a redundant spacewalk server in the second site? We want
> % to be able to centrally track all of our servers on spacewalk and if
> % possible not worry about the primary site going down.
> 
> Hi Bernard,
> 
> this is exactly what spacewalk proxy is for.  So the setup would be:
> Spacewalk server in site1 and proxy in site2, machines from site1
> connected directly to spacewalk and machines from site2 connected via
> proxy.
> 
> You may also think about setting up another proxy in site1 and routing
> site1 machines through it to have the same setup both sites.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --
> Michael Mráka
> Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20130304/480b8125/attachment.htm>