[Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

[Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro]

Daryl

I sent a email to list last month about it (
https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/2014-October/msg00222.html),
take a look, the idea is the same.

Tell me if is ok to you, about understanding, case not, I can create a post
about it in my blog.

B'Regards

______________
Atenciosamente
Waldirio
msn: waldirio at gmail.com
Skype: waldirio
Site: www.waldirio.com.br
Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646
PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Daryl Rose <rosede12 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Amedeo,
>
> For the 6.5 base I used the URL path:
>
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/os/x86_64/
>
> I am in the process of adding an update channel, and I am using URL:
>
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/updates/x86_64/
>
> Are these not correct?  Should I use only
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6?
>
> The documentation leaves a lot to be desired and doesn't provide an
> example of setting up the repository channel.  I found a YouTube video of a
> guy setting up a Spacewalk channel and repository.  He used the first URL
> that I posted.  Is using http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6  a better
> method?
>
> Any and all suggestions made are greatly appreciated.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Daryl
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Amedeo Salvati <amedeo at oscert.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> @daryl
>> did you use relative path for specifically centos 6.5 like:
>>
>> /mirrors/CentOS/6.5
>>
>> or you use generic 6 version? like:
>>
>> /mirrors/CentOS/6
>>
>> both for base and updates, because centos repos when release new minor
>> release will empty updates directory on the last one
>>
>> best regards
>> a
>>
>> Da: spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com
>> A: spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>> Cc:
>> Data: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 16:44:25 +0100
>> Oggetto: Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?
>>
>> > Daryl Rose wrote:
>> > % I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server. I created
>> a
>> > % 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client
>> server
>> > % and registered it on to the Spacewalk server.
>> > %
>> > % When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many
>> how many
>> > % updated packages it needed by doing a "yum update". It needed 264
>> > % packages, however, I DID NOT perform the update. Just looking. I then
>> > % registered the 6.5 client with the Spacewalk server and checked to
>> see if
>> > % it was up to date or not. Spacewalk is telling me that the client is
>> > % up-to-date. This is not accurate, why?
>> >
>> > So you have CentOS 6.5 client registered to CentOS 6.5 channel in
>> Spacewalk.
>> > And Spacewalk UI says it's up-to-date. Why do you think it isn't
>> accurate?
>> >
>> > If you don't have 6.6 packages in Spacewalk then it can hardly know
>> about updates.
>> >
>> > % Thanks.
>> > %
>> > % Daryl
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > --
>> > Michael Mráka
>> > Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Spacewalk-list mailing list
>> > Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20141106/da5541cc/attachment.htm>