[Spacewalk-list] spacewalk-utils-2.3.37 and spacewalk-common-channels

[Kalchik, Jeffery]

I certainly wouldn't argue against that (and why I posted to the list and not straight to a Bugzilla report.)  What depends on that column width?

I'm in almost a perfect test environment at the moment, but under a bit of a time crunch.  I'll make the change and see if I find anything else that relates to this.

Jeff Kalchik
Systems Engineering
Land O'Lakes

-----Original Message-----
From: spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Tomas Lestach
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 4:40 AM
To: spacewalk-list at redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] spacewalk-utils-2.3.37 and spacewalk-common-channels

> > On 21 May 2015, at 1:24 am, Kalchik, Jeffery
> > <JDKalchik at landolakes.com> wrote:
> >
> > Only theOracle repositories end up with the issue.  When replicating
> > the activity in the browser front end, I receive the
> > following:
> >
>
> https://github.com/spacewalkproject/spacewalk/pull/256
>
> I've double-checked and all the labels are under 60 characters now.
>
> Cheers,
> Avi

Hello,

In this case I'd rather extend the label [1], so we're not limited by its size.
I hope the solution is acceptable and I'd reject the PR.

Regards,
--
Tomas Lestach
Red Hat Satellite Engineering, Red Hat

[1] https://github.com/spacewalkproject/spacewalk/commit/facb6866380eb36e7791340614f765b004e564bd

_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
This message may contain confidential material from Land O'Lakes, Inc. (or its subsidiary) for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may not be reviewed, disclosed, copied, distributed or used by anyone other than the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.