[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/4] introduce tracehook_finish_jctl() helper



> I'd prefer to send it separately, just to avoid the "how this hook is
> connected to subtle changes in do_signal_stop" questions/discussion.

Fine, it's up to you and Andrew.

> Hmm... shouldn't we move this comment above schedule() ? And, perhaps,
> 
> 	/* Now we don't run again until continued or killed */
> 
> ?

Sure, it's fine to rewrite it.  You might say "woken by SIGCONT or SIGKILL"
to make it a little more explicit what you mean.


Thanks,
Roland


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]