[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Q: what user_enable_single_step() actually means?



> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:36:54 +0200, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > It would be worthwhile to cons a version of this test case that uses
> > PTRACE_SINGLESTEP instead of PTRACE_SYSCALL.  I think your situation
> > is tickling the same issue, but we should have an empirical test.
> [...]
> > I have a fix in hand that I'll send upstream before too long.  But perhaps
> > it should wait for the PTRACE_SINGLESTEP version of the test case.
> 
> Seeing you already added one yourself.

Yes, it was easy enough to make the variant and I wanted to test it.  I did
so, and submitted the fix upstream, and Linus merged it.  I didn't ask for
it to be put in stable branches, since we probably don't care.


Thanks,
Roland


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]