[vfio-users] Steam blocking VMs in csgo?

Brandon Ganem brandonganem at gmail.com
Mon Feb 27 03:06:45 UTC 2017


Just got kicked again from a casual game. I had not been running it as
admin, but doing so just now was not enough to let me back into a game.

I'll do my best to find some contact points with Valve and reference this
thread as well. Thanks again!

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Ethan Bugden <ethan961 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Just to clarify, you did repair the steam service in an elevated command
> prompt/as admin, not a regular one? I've never had this problem occur and
> have it not solved by a repair, at least it should work long enough to
> finish your match. It does sound like this is an actual issue with playing
> in VMs being flagged in the first place though. I just did another 45mins
> of Valve DM in my VM without issues, I'll keep playing in VM when I play to
> gather some more info. I call qemu through the CLI, my CPU line is: -cpu
> host,hv_time,hv_vapic,hv_relaxed,hv_spinlocks=0x1fff, I don't hide KVM. I
> think we'd probably get better results emailing the VAC and/or CSGO teams
> than submitting a ticket. We only want to use one instance of the game, so
> hopefully if they're at least aware of this use case they can keep it in
> mind during future developments. Or if they fixed the native client that
> would be nice....
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Brandon Ganem <brandonganem at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'll give it a go again if I get kicked after these changes. Thanks for
>> your help!
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Taiidan at gmx.com <Taiidan at gmx.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Damn, like I said you should submit a support ticket with valve.
>>>
>>> I am sure there is a way, no matter how hard the web 2.0 companies try
>>> to make it.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/26/2017 09:39 PM, Brandon Ganem wrote:
>>>
>>>> Updated to the following:
>>>>    <features>
>>>>      <acpi/>
>>>>      <hyperv>
>>>>        <relaxed state='on'/>
>>>>        <vapic state='on'/>
>>>>        <spinlocks state='on' retries='8191'/>
>>>>      </hyperv>
>>>>      <kvm>
>>>>        <hidden state='on'/>
>>>>      </kvm>
>>>>    </features>
>>>>    <cpu mode='host-passthrough'>
>>>>      <topology sockets='1' cores='6' threads='2'/>
>>>>    </cpu>
>>>>    <clock offset='localtime'>
>>>>      <timer name='hypervclock' present='yes'/>
>>>>    </clock>
>>>>
>>>> So far i'm in a game, but it typically takes anywhere from 30 minutes
>>>> to an
>>>> hour to get VAC'd based on the last 3 attempts.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Taiidan at gmx.com <Taiidan at gmx.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You need to use a newer version of libvirt that has the vendor tag
>>>>> workaround to be able to get past that, it should also give you better
>>>>> performance to use all the hyperv enhancements.
>>>>>
>>>>> This
>>>>> <vendor_id state='on' value='whatever'/>
>>>>> needs to be supported but I forgot which version added it
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02/26/2017 09:30 PM, Brandon Ganem wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like I've got the opposite of all of that enabled, probably was
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> code 43 issues. I'll update to recommended hyper-v settings and see.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Taiidan at gmx.com <Taiidan at gmx.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you try the hyperV clock? it could be a timer issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/vfio-users/attachments/20170226/2c6da1ae/attachment.htm>


More information about the vfio-users mailing list