[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [virt-tools-list] [libosinfo v3] Add data on GNOME 3.6



On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau redhat com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 06:13:57AM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/data/oses/gnome.xml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
>> +<libosinfo version="0.0.1">
>> +
>> +  <os id="http://gnome.org/3.6";>
>> +    <short-id>gnome3.6</short-id>
>> +    <name>GNOME 3.6</name>
>> +    <version>3.6</version>
>> +    <vendor>GNOME Project</vendor>
>> +    <family>linux</family>
>> +    <distro>gnome</distro>
>> +
>> +    <media arch="i686" live="true">
>> +      <url>http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/misc/promo-usb/GNOME-3.6.0.iso</url>
>> +      <iso>
>> +        <volume-id>GNOME36-LiveCD</volume-id>
>> +        <system-id>LINUX</system-id>
>> +      </iso>
>> +      <kernel>isolinux/vmlinuz0</kernel>
>> +      <initrd>isolinux/initrd0.img</initrd>
>> +    </media>
>> +
>> +    <resources arch="all">
>> +      <minimum>
>> +        <n-cpus>1</n-cpus>
>> +        <ram>805306368</ram>
>
> This..
>
>> +      </minimum>
>> +
>> +      <recommended>
>> +        <cpu>400000000</cpu>
>> +        <ram>1207959552</ram>
>> +        <storage>9663676416</storage>
>
> ...and this are the fedora values I think.

Yes, as at least right now its mostly just fedora with different names
and package collection AFAIK.

> Can this ISO be installed to disk?

Nope.

> (downloading one atm) I couldn't see any RAM/disk recommendations on
> http://www.gnome.org/getting-gnome/ , so it's probably better to only have
> a <minimum> node with some arbitrary memory requirement (and a comment
> saying so), and to get rid of this <recommended> node.

Agreed.

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]