[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [virt-tools-list] [Spice-devel] More on virt-viewer for windows
- From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange redhat com>
- To: Eric Blake <eblake redhat com>
- Cc: "libvir-list redhat com" <libvir-list redhat com>, spice-devel lists freedesktop org, Community support for Fedora users <users lists fedoraproject org>, virt-tools-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [virt-tools-list] [Spice-devel] More on virt-viewer for windows
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:43:39 +0100
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:38:03PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> [adding libvir-list, for some cross-compiling development hints]
>
> On 09/17/2013 11:57 AM, Fernando Lozano wrote:
>
> > Yes, the libvirt comes grom 0.10.2. I'm running the latest windows
> > binaries provided by spice-space.org:
> >
> > C:\Program Files\VirtViewer\bin>virsh -V
> > Virsh command line tool of libvirt 0.10.2
>
> Can someone from the Spice community chime in? Why is spice-space.org
> shipping a Fedora 18 build of libvirt (0.10.2.x) rather than Fedora 19
> (1.0.5.x)? Who does the builds, and how often are they updated?
I do builds when releasing new virt-viewer versions, and I use the latest
stable Fedora available at that time. We've not done any virt-viewer
release since F19 came out.
There's no reason why I couldn't do bug fix re-builds of the installer
though at any time if deemed neccessary.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]