Skip to main content

Using a schema registry to ensure data consistency between microservices

Make interservice communication easier by using a schema registry.
Architectural pattern

Data management has been the bane of enterprise computing since the days when mainframe computers had to reconcile data from a myriad of sources to do the even simplest month-end reporting. It was painful then. It’s painful now.

Want to get hands-on experience working with a schema registry?

Katacoda screenshot using apicurio

This article ships with a fully interactive set of lessons on Katacoda that demonstrate how to set up and use the Apicurio Registry. Katacoda provides a fully operational virtual machine into which you can execute instructions automatically by clicking on a command in the instructional text. You can find schema registry lessons on Katacoda here.

Understanding the problem of schema consistency

While it’s true that ETL (extract, transform, load) tools have made life easier within the given business domain, applications that process data between domains, particularly those applications based on microservice-oriented architecture, still have to struggle. Figure 1 below illustrates the problem. The illustration shows two data schemas. One describes an Order in the Orders microservice, and the other describes a Customer in the Sales microservice.

Diagram showing two microservices with similar properties

Figure 1: Order.destination and Customer.address have different property names, yet both data structures describe the same thing

Notice in Figure 1 above, an Order shown on the left side of the illustration has a property named destination. Destination has several attributes that look very similar to the attributes associated with the address property of Customer on the right side of the illustration. The attributes in Order.destination and Customer.address are similar, but they are not identical.

Order has the attributes province and postal_code, while Customer has the attributes state and zip_code. While these attributes differ in name, in terms of their semantics, they mean the same thing. Yet, for data to be exchanged between the Orders and Sales microservices, the disparity among property names must be accommodated, particularly when data exchange between microservices is facilitated using automation. While it’s easy for a human to notice similarities in meaning among attributes with different names, it’s a significant task for machine intelligence.

Solving the data schema problem

So then, from an Enterprise Architecture point of view, what measures can we take to make it so services can exchange data without incurring the mishap of schema incongruity?

One way to make it so that one process can understand the data structures used in another process is to use a translation tool such as BizTalk Server. This is a viable solution, but one that has historically required human intelligence to implement. Some engineer somewhere has to take the time to map one attribute to another manually, for example, mapping postal_code to zip_code as shown in Figure 1 above. It’s a time-consuming task.

Another way is to make sure that all services describe data in the same way. This is where a schema registry comes into play. A schema registry is a program or service that describes the data structures used in a given domain. Its purpose is to be the sole source of truth in terms of schema definitions.

The value of using a schema registry

Centralizing all schema definitions at a common point for reference provides a way for services to exchange data reliably. There’s no guessing. For example, if a service, Microservice A, wants to exchange data with another service, Microservice B all that’s required is for Microservice A to get the definition for the particular schema published by Microservice B from the service registry. (See Figure 2 below.)

The schema registry serves as the sole source of truth

Figure 2: A schema registry serves as the sole source of truth for all data schema using a given domain

Once Microservice B’s schema is known, the developer programming Microservice A can create the data exchange code.

If Microservice A is holding data in a structure that is incongruent with Microservice B’s schema, some mapping will need to be done. There’s no magic. But, at the least, the developer writing the data exchange code will be aware of the conditions to satisfy because Microservice B’s data schema is well known. It’s not a question of reverse engineering some code in play and then having to figure out the mapping. Having the reliability provided by a single source of truth is a definite time-saver.

Another area where a schema registry provides significant value is around validation. In the world of data management, there are few experiences more disappointing than writing a bunch of data validation code based on a given example, only to have the code become worthless because the underlying data schema you used was changed by a Data Architect somewhere upstream in the development process. Using a schema registry minimizes the problem. In some cases, using a schema registry makes the issue go away altogether.

The way it works is that when it comes time to validate some data, the developer will get the schema associated with the submitted data from the domain’s schema registry. As shown in Figure 3 below, the developer will validate the submitted data against the current data schema retrieved from the registry.

Developers use a schema registry to create validation code

Figure 3: Developers can use a schema registry to create validation code that is always accurate

The implicit contract in play is that all parties active in the given domain are expected to use the schema registry to store schema definitions and that all schema versions are the latest in play. No data schemas should exist outside of the registry. No schemas should be hardcoded into programs. It’s bad business. Instead, as mentioned above, the schema registry is the sole source of truth and needs to be treated as such.

Putting it all together

Schema registries are becoming quite popular. There are a few out there already, such as Red Hat Service Registry and Apicurio Registry (See Figure 4, below).

Apicurio is an open-source Schema Registry

Figure 4: Apicurio is an open source schema registry that supports a wide variety of formats

Granted, things can get tricky when committing yourself to a particular provider’s schema registry service, particularly when working in a multi-provider architecture. You will have to declare one provider the authority. But having the benefit of a single source for defining data structures and creating solid, verifiable boundaries based on those structures outweighs the risk of dedicating yourself to a single provider. Should you need to make a change and move to another provider, it’s a controllable event.

Regardless of which approach you take, whether to use a particular provider’s schema registry or roll your own, the important thing to understand is that a schema registry provides significant benefits for ensuring the easier exchange of data between services while reducing the work that goes with validating data coming into a service.

If you’re not using a schema registry as a resource for your activities as an enterprise architect, now is a good time to look at the technology. Schema registries are here to stay. The benefits they provide are hard to ignore.

Author’s photo

Bob Reselman

Bob Reselman is a nationally known software developer, system architect, industry analyst, and technical writer/journalist. More about me