Thomas Sowell opines in Basic Economics that “[…] the real cost of anything is still its value in alternative uses. The real cost of building a bridge is whatever else could have been built with that same labor and material. The cost of watching a television sitcom or soap opera is the value of the other things that could have been done with that same time.”
[ You might also enjoy: 5 ways to ruin a sysadmin's day ]
Organizations make this determination every time they choose to work on one ticket, project, or objective and key result (OKR) over another. Making this value judgment explicit is critical to a well-functioning organization. To do this effectively, organizations must understand and communicate priorities, and individuals must be incentivized to work towards those priorities.
If an organization does not understand its own priorities, it is impossible to prioritize the “right work” since that term is undefined. Organizational goals, explicitly communicated in a format like OKRs, align disparate teams around a clear set of objectives. Even on teams that collaborate effectively, a formalized, regular goal-setting process minimizes drift and overlap across teams and departments.
Furthermore, incentivize individuals to fulfill these organizational priorities. If an organization rates employees on their response times to customer requests, but the OKRs are all centered around long-term internal projects, this misalignment means workers will never achieve the organizational goals. Either adjust the employee ratings to align with the OKRs or adjust the OKRs.
[ Getting started with containers? Check out this free course. Deploying containerized applications: A technical overview. ]
Apply this thinking to your day-to-day tasks. Is this ticket or project worth working on in light of your team, department, and organizational priorities? Are incentives structured in a way that encourages individuals to work on the projects you want them working on? If such organizational priorities are not set at all or are not clearly communicated, start a dialogue with leadership around these topics. Encourage them to provide this guidance so everyone on the team can make better decisions.
Always consider the bridge not built.
저자 소개
Jonathan Roemer is a senior DevOps engineer at Drizly with an interest in security, automation, and the human side of IT. He can usually be found hiking or reading a book on his porch.
유사한 검색 결과
Bridging the gap: Red Hat Academy shaping open source talent in APAC
Behind the scenes of RHEL 10, part 3
How Do We Mentor the Next Generation of IT Leaders? | Compiler
compiler-re-role-technical-support
채널별 검색
오토메이션
기술, 팀, 인프라를 위한 IT 자동화 최신 동향
인공지능
고객이 어디서나 AI 워크로드를 실행할 수 있도록 지원하는 플랫폼 업데이트
오픈 하이브리드 클라우드
하이브리드 클라우드로 더욱 유연한 미래를 구축하는 방법을 알아보세요
보안
환경과 기술 전반에 걸쳐 리스크를 감소하는 방법에 대한 최신 정보
엣지 컴퓨팅
엣지에서의 운영을 단순화하는 플랫폼 업데이트
인프라
세계적으로 인정받은 기업용 Linux 플랫폼에 대한 최신 정보
애플리케이션
복잡한 애플리케이션에 대한 솔루션 더 보기
가상화
온프레미스와 클라우드 환경에서 워크로드를 유연하게 운영하기 위한 엔터프라이즈 가상화의 미래